The Bruised Hand in the Cookie Jar

[00:00] Pod Save America is brought to you by SimpliSafe. There's a line between home security and a neighborhood surveillance dragnet. You want to know who's at your door? Not track every passerby walking their dog on the sidewalk. SimpliSafe respects that boundary. It's why you can trust them with your home. [00:13] I set up a SimpliSafe system. It's incredibly easy to do. I customized it on the website. Did you pick up a drill? I didn't even think of a drill. Didn't even need a drill. It just sticks right on there. And once you have it set up, the app is really great. The customer support was always great. It really does give you peace of mind. Security can be expensive. It costs a billion dollars to secure the White House ballroom. Yeah, not your house, though. No, much less. Much less. With SimpliSafe, you can customize your system to fit your needs. It ships fast directly to your door. The app guided setup is simple, and there's no drilling required. [00:41] People are really upset about the drilling, huh? They're not the drill. It's so important. No holes. So you can install and arm your system in under an hour. SimpliSafe is more than just a security camera. It's a comprehensive system of sensors, indoor and outdoor cameras, and 24-7 professional monitoring. It's backed by SimpliSafe's 24-7 professional monitoring agents who dispatch emergency help when you need it. [01:00] Over 5 million people value and trust SimpliSafe with their home security every day. Right now, our listeners will get 50% off a new system when you sign up for professional monitoring and your first month is free. Just visit SimpliSafe.com slash crooked. That's half off at SimpliSafe.com slash crooked. There's no safe like SimpliSafe. [01:18] There's a new show from The Guardian called Stateside with Kai and Carter. The idea is pretty simple. Slow things down. Focus on one story. Ask the questions you're probably already yelling at your phone. And by the end, actually feel like you understand what's going on. [01:29] They're digging into everything from authoritarianism to the rise of people dating AI chatbots to what's really behind the latest mission to the moon. No fluff, no pretending everything is fine, just smart conversations and sharp reporting. The show pulls from The Guardian's global newsroom, so you're getting coverage across politics, culture, climate, and more, plus conversations with big thinkers and newsmakers. Join Kai Wright and Carter Sherman three times a week as they try to make sense of all this. New episodes drop every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, starting May 13th. You can watch on YouTube or listen wherever you get your podcasts.

[02:20] Welcome to Pod Save America, I'm Jon Favreau. I'm Jon Lovett. I'm Tommy Detour. On today's show, we're going to break down the new gold standard New York Times poll [02:31] midterms. [02:32] Let's have that election today, huh? [02:34] Please, hurry it up. We'll also talk about how Trump's revenge tour came for Louisiana Senator Bill Cassidy. [02:39] and is coming for Congressman Thomas Massey in Tuesday's Kentucky primary. There's also some fresh new corruption to discuss, Trump's new taxpayer-funded $2 billion slush fund he'll use to reward his favorite criminals, and revelations that he's basically been day trading in his spare time, 3,700 stock trades. [02:56] In just three months. That's so many trades. So many trades. Just bad advice. Just put it in an index fund. Yeah, just kidding. We also got a new Iran taco brewing and renewed interest in Cuba and Greenland, which is just one of the reasons we'll also dive into the latest debate over how much Democrats and commentators should be talking about old man Trump. [03:16] Losing his marbles. Speaking of old men, check out Forrest over here. [03:22] He's going to sit here with this guy, this fucking nerd's got his glasses on. I was waiting for you to do it. Sorry, I scratched my eye. Don't get used to it, everyone, hopefully. But first, before we start, tickets for Crooked Con 2026 are on sale now for everyone. Come hang with us November 5th through 7th in Washington, D.C. [03:46] 26 midterms. See? I added more because Dan's so superstitious, you know. Cricket's Friends of the Pod get a subscriber-only price, so if you want a subscription loaded with exclusives and a discounted CricketCon ticket, be sure to join Friends of the Pod. There's all kinds of...

[04:03] benefits that come with that. Uh, no more ads when you're listening to any of these, any of your favorite cricket pods. Plus you get exclusive subscriber only shows like polar coaster with Dan Pfeiffer, only friends, which is our extra episode of, it's like our secret extra episode of America that we do and a whole bunch of other stuff, sub stack newsletters, everything. Uh, [04:23] Get the tickets for Crooked Con and all the info you need at CrookedCon.com. Go to Crooked.com slash friends to subscribe to Friends of the Pod. And we can't wait to see you at Crooked Con. All right. [04:33] Donald Trump and the Republican Party have been shitting the bed in nearly every poll for the last few months. [04:38] But now Nate Cohn and the New York Times have come down from the mountaintop with a stone tablet that confirms how screwed they are. Trump's approval is at 37 percent in their new poll. That is a record low for him and for both terms in all New York Times Siena polls. [04:56] And the midterm voters also favor Democrats by 11 points, 50 to 39 percent. [05:02] over Republicans. The president's biggest liability in the poll remains his handling of the cost of living, which his political strategists keep hoping he'll pretend to care about, as evidenced by Monday's White House event on his discount drug website, TrumpRx. [05:18] Let's see how it went. [05:20] I think outside of maybe a cure itself, it's the biggest thing to happen to health care and everything having to do with. [05:27] medical in any in any way shape or form there's never been anything like this. [05:32] Really sold it, huh? What? Why did that even mean? Really sold it. Trump Rx is the biggest thing in medical. It's the biggest thing in medical.

[05:38] Biggest thing in medical. You can tell because there's a doctor here. [05:42] You can tell he didn't like the event because he cut it really short. [05:45] Because it kind of looked like TEDx Toledo or something. It was just like Joe Gebi in front of a giant screen. The whole thing was embarrassing. Mark Cuban was there. Trump Rx, by the way, it's not a platform for buying medications. Do you know that? It's just a facilitator. You go to the website, it directs you to the other websites to buy the drugs. And sometimes it gives you coupons. Just redirects you? Yeah, basically. And then Amazon and Cuban's thing, what's his thing called? Cost Plus Drugs. Cost Plus Drugs. [06:15] some discounts on some extra drugs, but also if you have insurance doesn't help you, meaning it's cheaper to buy the drugs if you have insurance because the insurance covers the drugs. So really it's for people who don't have insurance sometimes get some discounts on some drugs. [06:27] So it's not a bad thing, but it's not a it's not weird. It's not. It's certainly not the biggest thing since medical. No. [06:35] What stood out to you guys in the New York Times poll? [06:37] So whenever we're talking about a poll that looks good for Democrats, you got to go down and find the part where it's terrible for Democrats. And there's a this was a new one, I think they said, are you satisfied or dissatisfied with the Democratic Party? And [06:50] I'm used to seeing that voters may be really unhappy with Republicans and planning to vote for Democrats, but then are ultimately not super satisfied with Democrats either. I was surprised to see that 70% of people say they are dissatisfied with the Democratic Party and only 5% are very satisfied, which is a third of the number of people that are very satisfied with Trump. I get being, look, Republicans are in power. This is representing people that hate Democrats. It's represented by people that wish Democrats would fight more. It's represented by Democrats.

[07:20] the Democrats are represented in that number. But the fact that... Where would you be in that when someone asks you? I would be unsatisfied. I'm unsatisfied, baby. I'm unsatisfied. But then when they gave me the generic ballot thing, I'd be right there. But just the fact that right now, [07:37] if this whole big beautiful country of ours there's only five percent of people that just love the democratic party like we talk a lot about the base it's like we don't really have you know the trump has a base that is who are those people right who are those five percent i love everything they're doing can't wait to see them on tour like like some of the some of the staffers maybe i don't know some relatives a couple folks on blue sky i don't know um [08:02] So anyway, that's what stood out to you. That stood out to me, and then there was... [08:06] There is a number on AI that I thought was just interesting that only 16% of people think AI is more good than bad. The vast majority are either undecided or think it's more bad than good. It comes in a weekend where there's all these commencement addresses where students are booing the mere mention of AI by the speakers. Yeah, which I love. You can tell there's a... [08:24] Something afoot there. Yes, there is. Yes, there is. Tommy, what did you think? I liked that. I did. I liked that. I noticed that 64% in the Times poll said they think that going to war with Iran was the wrong decision, including 73% of independents. That is pretty clear cut, and it's not going to get better as this thing kind of drags out and the straightover moves, remains closed, and the price of gas goes up. 76% rate economic conditions today is only fair or poor. That is quite bad.

[08:54] Democratic Party was 50% say they will vote Democrat, 39% say they will vote Republican in the midterm. So it's one of the better numbers of that nature I think we've seen in a while. We've been saying Trump bad for so long now that when there's a poll this bad, it's sort of hard. It's almost like there's a crying wolf thing. Yeah, yeah. Or like, you know, not Trump's, I mean, Trump's always been bad, but like, this is it for Trump. Things that the walls are closing in. [09:24] under 38% for more than a few days in the last 17 years, according to our average. Now we've got Donald Trump. And then he realized 17 years is George W. Bush, which just makes us really old. But that is the last president to be this unpopular for this long. The fact that this is [09:42] This is worse than January 6th now for him. Well, the economic indicators are just so bad. I mean, 76% say they're concerned about their personal finances. The CBS poll. 67% say they're stressed. Like, both of those have ticked up the last year. Only 29% in the CBS, recent CBS poll said the economy is good. 77% say their income is not keeping up with inflation. So, like, gas prices are just killing everybody. Yeah, that... [10:07] To me, you look at it too, what's hidden is just how [10:10] many people have just they're done right you get look at this poll and it's basically almost half not quite half the country they don't approve on iran they don't approve on the economy they don't approve on cost of living they don't approve on immigration they are done and the number of people who now say trump has personally made their economic circumstances worse 44 44 which has gone up by like eight points since the last time like so it's gone up from about a third of the country it's rising up to nearly half are no longer saying just i don't just disapprove like

[10:40] was... [10:41] uh, uh, [10:43] One other thing that stood out just about what's happening with Iran, that we have a lot of internet debates about the anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism and the Democrats' position on Israel. Meanwhile, opposition to economic and military support to Israel has gone from 38% to 57% over the last two and a half to three years. Support has gone from 54% to 37%. Same number as Trump's approval. [11:13] about as popular as Donald Trump in this country. And so, look, this is not an argument that's being lost on the margins, and it's not an argument that's being lost based on who gets platformed and who doesn't. There's a huge shift that has happened. I think you can lay that at the feet of Benjamin Netanyahu and Joe Biden and Donald Trump. But the sooner people make this less about [11:33] the specific individuals they dislike. [11:36] often with good reason and more about the deeper shift that is happening, I think the sooner people can actually reckon with what is a real and lasting damage that has happened to America's relationship with Israel. Yeah, I mean, Axios wrote a story this morning about just the horrific anti-Semitism being directed towards members of Congress and voicemails and threats and all that. And it's horrible. And I would just say that, like, I do think it's important to separate, like, [12:05] like virulent antisemitism from people who are, [12:09] pro-israel and making the case for supporting israel like we i think we talked about this last week but like josh gottheimer's op-ed about antisemitism and my party has a problem too like it starts with talking about actual antisemitism and then halfway through it suddenly veers into oh and also democrats are voting against funding uh you know military aid to israel which is now a majority position that's that should not be in the same op-ed well nanyahu says that he wants to wean off military support for israel so yeah right i wish i would say the uh the only other thing that

[12:39] the generic ballot [12:40] There's real movement just within the Times poll, right? Because every poll is a single poll, snapshot in time, but you take a poll over time. And it was D plus two to D plus five for the beginning part of Trump's term, second term in the Times-Siena polls. And now it's D plus 11. It's a big shift. And then when they take it to only almost certain or very likely voters, it's D plus 14. [13:10] know, the most motivated voters end up turning out in a midterm more so than in a general election. So that's it's pretty big. And it's late May, you know, not a lot, not a ton of time left. Knock on wood. Yeah. Well, I mean, look, Trump still has time to become a different person. [13:26] The bigger news from the White House on Monday was the announcement that President Trump's Justice Department is settling Donald Trump's lawsuit against the IRS for one point seven seven six billion dollars. Get it. [13:40] taken directly from taxpayers and funneled into a slush fund that apparently exists to pay Trump supporters who were investigated or indicted or convicted for a crime. [13:50] during the Biden administration, or I guess none of those things, because there's really no guard rails whatsoever. It seems like they did this so Trump wouldn't be attacked for directly pocketing taxpayer dollars. But I'm not sure this move is as clever as they think. What about you guys? Trump's second term is a political smash and grab job where he and his family and the people around him, people who do his bidding, just take what they want, get rewarded. They take it

[14:20] I think the fact that Trump is doing this before the midterms just shows that he doesn't give a shit about politics anymore. It's all about money, and it's all about building monuments to himself and enriching himself. And they made an end run around the judge in this case, and they just cut a deal with another political appointee that he had named to create the slush fund. And do you think they thought it was cute saying it was 1.776? Doesn't that just make the whole thing feel like made up and arbitrary more than anything else? [14:50] America's 250 is coming up, and so if we call it a patriotic fund for patriots, then no one will get mad at us. Shouldn't a fund to pay out restitution to people harmed be based on... [15:00] like metrics and not an anniversary. Where's the number coming from? How much earnings did you lose when you were at the capital on January 6th? I will say, [15:12] Congress passed a law to give the Department of Justice basically an unlimited fund for restitution for anyone who sues the federal government. And so that's how they ended up doing this. So it's like it is a one of those technically legal but extremely corrupt things that we have because of a stupid law that was passed that no one no one thought to themselves. Maybe there'll be an administration that just has the fund being unlimited because the president will sue himself. Well, in fairness to people that wrote that law, you would also assume that if it were to be. [15:42] completely and obviously and brazenly abused by a president who's basically just [15:46] going into the treasury and stuffing his pockets and leaving that there might be a Congress that would care about that, which we don't have. Just like to Tommy's point, the judge...

[15:55] was like, hey, before this lawsuit, [15:57] Bye, Trump. [15:59] against his own administration, which is unprecedented, that's being administered by his personal attorney, former personal attorney at the Department of Justice. I want you to come in and explain to me how you're actually parties in opposition, how you're not on the same side of this thing. And they're like, the deadline's May 20th. That's when now it's May 18th. And so, you know, basically proving the point that the judge was worried about. [16:21] They have decided to reach a reach a deal beforehand. Now, the Justice Department, if it was actually advocating on behalf of taxpayers, the American people, which is what it's supposed to do, it would fight this thing to the bitter end or at the very least settle for zero dollars, which has happened in not exactly similar, but cases that are akin to this in the past. But instead, they're doing this. Yeah, doing this. Exactly. The same case. His taxpayer info was leaked and he settled it for zero dollars. He had a public apology from the IRS because he didn't pay. [16:51] That is something that could have come of this. But it said, no, they are proving that they are in cahoots here by doing this kind of a settlement. They're using a ridiculous justification based on something that happened in the Obama administration, which even conservative legal scholars have batted down because that had actual specific people who were harmed by an actual specific policy unlike this. My pitch is James Comey, Tish James, LaMonica MacGyver, Lisa Cook, Jerome Powell. They should all be submitting when this thing comes out. [17:21] They should put their names in to get money from this fund. And if they do not receive a fair hearing, they should sue the federal government. Like there are people that are being politically prosecuted by the government. As far as we know publicly, nobody on that list would not be kind of at least potentially prosecuted.

[17:37] included in the people hurt that could receive from this 1776. My pitch is, no one gets it. Give us the fucking money back. That's our money. [17:47] Oh, yeah. To be clear, I don't think James Comey should get money from the federal government, but I think we should take this, put this thing through its paces. This is fucking, yeah, well, they're not going to, I mean, Trump appoints the board. It's five people. He gets to hire and fire the board. It's going to be five cronies dishing out money. They don't, like, this is, this thing doesn't even have to be like, oh, and here was my case and it was tried incorrectly. Like, someone's just can go to fucking whoever Todd Blanche puts on the commission and be like, hey, I want $10,000 because I donated to the president and I'm mad that Joe Biden sent the FBI after me. [18:17] know they were watching me. It's crazy. [18:23] They're at the point where they're just saying, we're going to take money from the Treasury. Give it to whoever we want. And give it to our friends. Particularly people who are maybe criminals. To let everyone else know that if you commit a crime on Trump's behalf, not only do you not go to jail, but perhaps you might get some compensation for it. Yeah, but he was asked at the press conference today, could this potentially go to people who committed violence on January 6th? He said, oh, it's going to be up to the committee. Absolutely, those people would be eligible, could totally receive money from this fund. He pretends he doesn't know about it.

[18:53] and Donald Trump and J.D. Vance, whoever the fuck it is, tries to stay in the White House after they lose an election and a bunch of people do their bidding for them to help them out, what do you think they're going to think? They're going to be like, well, if he stays in there and I help him out, I'm going to be okay. I'm going to get a pardon. I get paid. Great. You guys don't like my idea that James Comey tries to get into that fund? Come on. Yeah, I mean, I see what you're saying. I think he should write out the amount he wants. Yeah, in shells. Yeah. Any shell-based crime should apply. [19:23] . [19:28] Pods of America is brought to you by Smalls. Smalls makes fresh human-grade food for cats. It's made from the same stuff you or I would eat, but formulated specifically to help cats thrive. Cats are... [19:39] obligate carnivores who need lots of real meat to stay healthy. But most cat foods out there use meat byproducts and cut their food with cheap grains, fillers, and artificial ingredients. Boy, you don't want that. You don't want that. You don't want cheap grains or fillers. Not for your feline friend. Basically, stuff that isn't great for your cat. Big pet food. Oh, big pet food. They do this because it's cheaper to make. But what they save on cost, your cat pays for with their health. With Smalls, I took a scoop for me and a scoop for [20:09] Me and Chesterfield, we sit across the table, I light a candle. Yeah, you're first looking shinier. Small's is different. Their fresh recipes are over 80% animal protein, and they never use fillers or artificial ingredients. Chesterfield's never been happier. Their food is so healthy that 88% of cat parents...

[20:25] say that after feeding smalls, [20:27] They notice that their cat has better digestion, is softer and shinier. What did I say? And has more energy to play because it's actually good for cats. If you want to invest in your cat's health, Smalls is giving you 60% off your cat's first order, plus free shipping and free treats for life when you go to smalls.com slash crooked. That's 60% off your first order plus free shipping and free treats for life when you head to smalls.com slash crooked. [20:49] Pod Save America is brought to you by ZipRecruiter. [20:51] When you're trying to hire, you want somebody who's qualified, but you also want somebody who's excited to do the job. You know, you can't just have somebody who has like all the right skills, but they, you know, then it's like you owe them a favor. You know what I mean? That's how I behave. [21:06] That's my role here. If you're hiring, you want a candidate who's passionate about the role, but you can't get that insight from a resume unless you post your job on ZipRecruiter. ZipRecruiter's powerful matching technology finds quality candidates quickly. And ZipRecruiter has a new feature that shows you the most interested, qualified candidates first. [21:21] the right people faster. Candidates can tell you in their own words why they're interested in your job. No wonder ZipRecruiter is the number one rated hiring site based on G2. Find candidates who really want your job on ZipRecruiter. Four out of five employers who post on ZipRecruiter get a quality candidate within the first day. Try it for free at ZipRecruiter.com slash crooked. That's ZipRecruiter.com slash crooked. Meet your match on ZipRecruiter.

[21:45] Speaking of Trump allies getting away with crimes, what do you guys make of Jared Polis, governor of Colorado, Democrat, commuting the prison sentence of election denier? [21:54] Tina Peters. She is the former county clerk from Mesa County, Colorado. She was in jail for orchestrating a security breach of her county's voting system. Trump has been publicly and privately pressuring Polis to pardon her completely. They also tried to transfer her from state prison to federal prison so that Trump could pardon her. Didn't do that. But now Polis [22:24] four and a half years with parole next month. I have to be honest. I know this is not a great answer for the purposes of a talk show. I just couldn't give less of a shit. I know people are like outraged about this. I read JBL's long piece on this. I don't give a shit. [22:37] I don't care. I have so much to be outraged or to worry about. I just can't even get myself to engage with this person. I may even go a step further. [22:44] I think Polis might have done the right thing. By cutting your sentence down? Wow. [22:52] Excuse me, boys. If you need me, I'll be at the fucking bulwark. [22:57] where the real libs are now. Go on. I'm not, I don't feel strongly. I'm more into, I'm closer to Tommy's camp, but like, here's the thing. [23:06] Um, [23:07] She was sentenced to nine years, right? So she's a nonviolent first-time offender. And three appellate judges who were appointed by a Democrat, they were Democratic judges, they all just ruled that they threw out the sentence, the nine-year sentence. So that was never going to happen. And the reason they threw it out is because they thought that the judge, basically in giving her a nine-year sentence as opposed to a smaller sentence, violated her free speech rights because the judge basically said, the reason I'm making your sentence longer is because you spouted election conspiracy theories.

[23:37] which is a horrible thing to do but that is protective first amendment speech I thought we have to be consistent but anyway I appreciate that but we understand that if someone were to say hit somebody with their car and then publicly say that bitch deserved it that is free speech you have the right to say that but it does potentially inform the sentence does it? [23:59] Of course it does. Of course we allow remorse in people's motivations and feelings about the crimes they committed, what they've learned from it. Well, she was – I mean, but the no remorse thing was already factored in because she didn't – she was not remorseful when she was sentenced. But that's – he didn't say you didn't show remorse. He said it's because you have these theories. I'm just saying that, like – Not just for – we take people's motivations and expressions. I agree that people have the right to believe elections are stolen. I'm just saying it's a little bit more than just first. Continue, sorry. [24:29] I guess I'm saying [24:30] If we believe that that there is an incarceration problem in this country and that people are incarcerated for too long and that prison is it is a deterrent. And yes, people should be jailed and they should be kept from society. But that unusually long sentences are bad, especially for first time nonviolent offenders. Like, don't we have to extend that belief to people whose political beliefs we detest? So I would say. [24:55] The answer is we should... [24:57] allow a process to play out. She would have been resentenced. Why did this become a big public controversy? It is because the President of the United States is publicly pressuring the governor of Colorado to commute

[25:07] Tina Peterson's. Now, look, I'm sure Jared Polis would say that the pressure had nothing to do with it. Obviously, the fact that Donald Trump was threatening Colorado unless he did something, right? Donald Trump was saying this woman should be pardoned. He is saying it's some kind of pushback against Trump, that it's only a commutation. She has kind of done the bare minimum of acknowledging that what she did was wrong. But if you go to her Twitter feed, her allies were saying, as recently as I believe last week, I have to go look at the exact timing, [25:37] that if Tina Peters isn't released, Trump should invade the state of Colorado. It is a nonviolent event. Yeah, I mean, I don't think that should happen. Well, right, but it just, it goes to, like, the... [25:48] The reason somebody who even commits a nut, look, there are a lot of first-time offenders who do something that are part of a... [25:54] that are part of something so dangerous that you have to say, wait a second, yes, this is a nonviolent offense, but it goes to the core of what we are as a society, the safety of our democracy. And so he has given into that pressure from Trump rather than let the process go. [26:07] play out. So that I think is a huge problem. I don't know that we'd be having this conversation if Donald Trump hadn't personally intervened to try to get the governor to do something. And then it seems as though he did it. After listening to this thoughtful debate, [26:22] I still don't give a shit. I might care less, actually. It is interesting. I would say that it's more interesting to me in that I think he might have been the right thing. I do think I would like to hear Jared Polis answer the question, why don't you just wait for the resentencing of the three appellate judges? What made you not want to just wait for their decision if they were going to throw out the sentence anyway? I would like to know that question. I'd also say, too, that the Republican prosecutor,

[26:49] was against this and said that you should talk to the people that were impacted by Tina Peter's schemes before you'd make this decision. Also a prosecutor. Well, sure. That's how prosecutors are. But community. But the defendant pled guilty to almost the same charges in the Georgia Rico case and was sentenced no time and probation. [27:08] Yeah, I mean, look, there's all kinds of unfairnesses and unequal application of sentences all across the country all the time. Like, if that were the case, you'd go and say, oh, well, there's somebody else who was given less. You can commute most sentences that way. But I think, look, in this one case... It wasn't just her. He commuted like 35 or 50 commutations or something like that on the same day. I think he has to answer for whether or not he gave in to Trump's political pressure. [27:38] reflections again like this is a grave threat to the republic why does our generosity our sense of justice our our empathy turn for tina peter is when there are so many others who have who deserve it that's all yeah and i don't think it should i don't think it should i don't think we should be generous or empathetic at all i think we should just be like what is the what is the standard like is there a process to reach the decision and it didn't meet a standard i do think that like criticizing polls for it is completely [28:05] fine. You can criticize him for it. You can say it's fine. Some people are, and people who I like in politics too and support are calling for his impeachment over this. And I'm like, I don't, I just, I do not think it rises to the level of it. Everybody's at a nine all the time these days. I can't get there. I can get there. I can get to your criticism for sure. I can't get to, he shouldn't be impeached over this. I don't know if you guys saw that Trump's latest financial

[28:35] stock trades in the first quarter of this year, bought $1 million each in companies with business before his administration like NVIDIA, Oracle, Microsoft, Boeing, and Palantir, which he bought right before he praised the company on Truth Social in a post-1990. [28:51] that if you recall, even included... [28:53] the company's ticker symbol. [28:57] Now, I know this may look suspicious, but the White House did say that Trump's assets are in a blind trust managed by his children. So there are, quote, no conflicts of interest. Seems fine, right? This is... Did they really? I thought there was no blind trust. I thought they'd already previously said there wasn't a blind trust. Either way, managed by your children... They're saying it's a blind trust managed by your children. That doesn't make any sense. That's not how a blind trust works. Again, this is part of the political smash and grab job. I mean, they're making money everywhere. This is crazy. So Bloomberg reported... [29:25] Trump had trades that involved Tesla, NVIDIA, Apple, Meta, Visa, Citi, Boeing, Qualcomm, and GE. Top executives from all of those companies were on Twitter. [29:35] his trip to Beijing to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping. [29:38] So you don't think he's getting insider information, having that access, talking to them, cutting deals with them? Some of the stock trades included up to 680 grand worth of Eli Lilly right as the administration was preparing policies that would benefit their GLP-1 business. He took a couple of huge positions in NVIDIA right before they announced major news. There was a $1 to $5 million position a week before they announced a partnership with Meta.

[30:08] announced some determinations to do with NVIDIA. They're buying and selling Intel stock, which the US government took a 10% stake in the company. This is insanity. [30:19] This is such a coincidence. Paul Pelosi somewhere is like, what the fuck, man? I could have been doing this so much better. Like, we're sort of... Everything... Well, Jesus. I'm like Jim Cramer now. Did you see the clip of Jim Cramer? Yeah. He just glitched out for 60 seconds. Can we drop it in here? Let's drop in the Jim Cramer clip. The president's been trading some intel in the quarter. Yeah. [30:40] You got nothing to say about it? Yeah. [30:49] Whoa. Yeah. All right. Don't worry. We're not having technical difficulties here, everybody. What's funny about the Jim Cramer clip is that it's like people are like, oh, wow, he's so he's stammering because he can't figure out what to say about this. But when I was watching, I was like, is he stammering because he can't figure out to say about this? Or is he making a joke about how it's so beyond the pale, but he doesn't want to be critical of Trump in this moment? Like, I didn't know what I know. What are we? What are we? Why is he stammering? He knows what's going on, but get in Jim Cramer's head. But we're just no, no, don't live and run for inside of Jim Cramer's head. [31:19] We're at a new level of brazen corruption because every step along the way, nobody has stopped him to get to this point. The thing that I find stunning about all this is that the level of brazenness is going up, but the dollar amount isn't always. It's like, why are we doing 500 grand stock trades? [31:37] billion dollar crypto theft and the watches like why like why you know what i mean like like it just it's just all of it's like leftover from uh the old world right you had to just do corruption well like the watch remember the hotel rooms like we're getting you the trump phones but they're not coming yeah that part doesn't make sense but the aggregate stock trades was a range between 211 and 687 million dollars so that's a pretty good quarter it's also like just the volume of trading uh bloomberg interviewed this guy eric uh dighton who's the president manager director at

[32:07] baffled in the 40 plus years of my time on wall street this is an unusual amount of trading by any standards we need to see the actual trades to try and understand why anyone would want to do that much trading like the practical way in which this is being done like is there a team that is doing this is it sons through their like it feels like they've got like um uh like uh christopher moltesante trying to like push what it's like he's got like some fucking back office in new jersey [32:37] shitload of Adderall. Yeah, just like minority reporting it. Like, I can see the future. I know what's going to happen at the commerce meeting next week. I know I have the BLS data. That's just because he's got the briefing book. Yeah. But again, they took like seven transactions related to Boeing. One was between one to five million dollars. Like the biggest deliverable of the China trip was to get the Chinese to buy a bunch of Boeing planes. And by the way, the announcement was so underwhelming that the stock went down because they did a shitty job. [33:07] It's like, yeah, you thought it was. You tried to trade on inside information. It just turns out you suck at diplomacy. That was the problem. You're good at the crimes. You're bad at diplomacy. Got to deliver on that shit. All right. So Trump's also doing his best to drag the Republican Party down with him. On Saturday, he sent yet another message that dissent will not be tolerated when his chosen primary challenger, Congresswoman Julia Letlow, took out Louisiana Senator Bill Cassidy, whose sin was voting to convict Trump in the January 6th impeachment trial.

[33:37] He claims he got third in Louisiana's primary, the first time an incumbent senator has come in lower than second place since 1944. Trump's next target is Thomas Massey, who is trying to unseat in Tuesday's Kentucky primary. Massey has been the strongest and kind of the only Republican in the House breaking with Trump on Epstein, Iran, and the big, beautiful bill. Trump has been posting about Massey nonstop. [34:07] to just tell people to vote against Thomas Massey. We're going to run the midterms on the Hatch Act, I assume. Right, yeah, that's, yeah, as he's grabbing the $2 billion for his slush fund and then trading on NVIDIA and Boeing, yeah. Pete Hegseth was doing an event in Kentucky today. His personal capacity. His personal capacity. And then Trump announces that he's delayed an imminent military assault on Iran that was supposed to happen tomorrow. Yeah, what was Pete going to do? That seems like bad timing. Feels like you need him for that. Yeah. Maybe you don't. [34:35] Who's going to drink the booze? [34:37] Too early to say what will happen in the Massey race, but it certainly seems like Massey himself is staying loose. Here he is on Sunday doing his best Trump impression. Whenever I call him, I got to schedule a minute for the first thing he tells me every time I call him. Massey, you're a sharp cookie. You went to MIT. You know, my professor was, my uncle was Professor John G. Trump. He was at MIT 41 years. It's a record.

[35:07] You know, I went to Wharton, which is basically the hardest school in the world to go into. This is terrible. So I get even better genetics than you. I do have some wrong with us. I kind of want him to lose now. That was brutal, too. I was rooting for him until just then. I'm too much saying. He's going for it, you know? Put that back down and work on the party, son. You've got to be wary on the Trump impression, you know? Don't do it unless you really feel good about it. You've got to nail it. There's just too many people doing it, and it's too big a target. Anyway, anyone have thoughts on the primary? Yeah, look, I mean. How big of a deal this is? [35:37] Like, fuck that guy. You know, like, he thought he could, like, appease MAGA by voting for Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and ended up kind of, like... [35:46] selling his soul and his credentials as a doctor and it being worst of all worlds. And he knew better. And we know it because he told us as much before he flip flopped. And so would I rather have him in the Senate than his replacement? Yes, I would. But ultimately, I don't think it'll make a big difference. Thomas Massey is a different story. Like, he's the reason we have the Epstein files, because he worked with Ro Khanna to get him released. He's a principled vote against wars and militarism and lots of other things. I don't agree

[36:16] you know, Christmas cards with me and my kids with machine guns, like I think he did one time. But, you know, it would be a big loss. And I think it tells you everything you need to know about Donald Trump's political worldview, that he will not lift a finger to help his party build, but he will take down anyone who criticizes him. It is all about punishing his own critics and the cult of personality and protecting his personal power and not about the party or doing anything. Right. I think he's far more passionate about defeating his enemies than he is about helping his friends. Yeah. With Cassidy... [36:45] You go back to that, to him, uh, uh, [36:48] approving rfk jr and accepting his fake assurances in his private meetings pretending that rfk didn't believe what he obviously believed and like no you can't you can't sell half your soul he doesn't work like that they're not divided they're not divisible in that way and so these guys that end up being reluctantly for trump they don't [37:10] They're not better politicians. They're just worse whores, you know? Yep. So, you know, good riddance, I suppose. I will say this is – there's a lot being made because we had Indiana and then Cassidy and then Massey. But this is sort of the last gasp of this forever. I mean, it's Louisiana, too. What do you expect is going to happen? This is Trump's last midterms. Right. Right. [37:29] And do we think he's going to be spending time in 28 going around doing primary challenges? Maybe. But also, does it lose its force at some point? I don't know. [37:40] He's already a lame duck. He clearly has the juice to do it now. But as we get to 28 and then beyond that, what did we learn from that? Yeah, that he's an addictive prick who only cares about himself. And I think we also learned that...

[37:55] Nothing's breaking the fever in the Republican Party. The party's broken. You've got to massively defeat them at every level because all the ones who are left are completely loyal to dear leader. And that's about that. And I do think also he might have. [38:11] He might have fucked himself a little because now you've got angry Cassidy who's still got votes left to take between now and the end of the year. [38:19] Massey loses. Tillis has already been doing it. And so they can make his life more difficult. And I do wonder now, between now and November, if this makes it harder for Republicans to... [38:34] break away from Trump, even though primaries are over because they worry that they're going to get punished? I don't know. It's just, look, it remains sort of extraordinary, right? Bill Cassidy, [38:45] could not persuade his own voters, people that have voted for him multiple times in the past, to stick with him once Trump turned. It just tells you something about the voters showing up in these Republican primaries and what they want. And the fact that Cassidy was a vote for impeachment and that Trump had fully turned against him, there was nothing he could do to convince them that he was worth saving. Nothing. [39:14] Yeah. [39:17] Pod Save America is brought to you by HIMSS. ED is way more common than most guys think. Millions of guys deal with it at some point, and that's exactly why HIMSS offers a straightforward way to handle it. HIMSS connects you with licensed healthcare providers online, giving you simple access to legitimate ED treatments from home. I want some illegitimate ED treatments for those. I was going to my office the other day. I saw John Googling real Chinese rhino horn. I was like, Jesus, that's terrible. Shame on you. No awkward appointments with HIMSS. No pharmacy lines.

[39:47] out the door, everyone's looking for their boner pills. It's wild. Just complete a simple online intake and a provider will review your information to determine if treatment is right for you. I'm here to pick up the medicine for people who have too big of a penis. [40:02] Yeah, mine has lasted more than three hours. [40:07] If prescribed your treatment ships directly to your door in discreet packaging. That includes sildenafil. I know how to pronounce that for the record. Thank you. There's no pundits on it. Oh, pundits on it. [40:17] Rectile dysfunction. Pundit is also heart medicine. [40:21] Also known as generic for Viagra. There we go. Available through HIMSS at up to 95% less than the brand name version. And if that option isn't right for you, there are additional treatment options available so you can find what works best for your body. It's straightforward, transparent, and designed to make getting care feel easy. To get simple online access to personalized, affordable care for ED, weight loss, and more, visit HIMSS.com slash crooked. That's HIMSS.com slash crooked for your free online visit. HIMSS.com slash crooked. Prescription required. See [40:47] website for details and important safety information. Sildenafil is the generic version of Viagra. Viagra is a registered trademark of Viatris Specialty LLC. HIMSS is not affiliated with or endorsed by Viatris. [41:02] It's been a bit since we talked about the stalemate in Iran. Trump posted on Sunday that, quote, the clock is ticking for Iran to make a deal, but by Monday... [41:09] The clock apparently restarted. Trump posted that the U.S., quote, will not be doing the scheduled attack of Iran tomorrow, a.k.a. Tuesday, the day you're listening to this, because the leaders of Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE asked him to hold off due to serious negotiations that are now taking place. Trump did add that the U.S. is prepared to attack Iran, quote, on a moment's notice in the event that an acceptable deal is not reached. On Monday, it was also reported that Iran sent its latest peace proposal through Pakistan to the U.S.,

[41:39] in Israel are, quote, engaged in intense preparations, the largest since the ceasefire took effect for the possible resumption of attacks against Iran, according to the New York Times. What do you make of the back and forth here, Tommy? Like any any chance that Trump's latest threat to destroy Iran got them closer to a deal, scared them into it? I don't think so. But can we just talk about these statements where he name checks a bunch of autocrats? They're so weird. You don't have to do that. But he's always like, on behalf of the great and highly respected [42:09] decided not to exterminate Iran. The delivery date for that plane was supposed to be the 4th, but he once moved up for his birthday. For the Qatari plane. So he wants the Qataris to get that plane there fast. It's the same way that he does the... [42:24] personality stuff with g like he enjoys the idea that governing doesn't involve anyone except the people in the room like there's no people deciding right they're just great men making big decisions together at a collaboration and friendship and so yeah he's not doing it for the good of the country he's doing it because he was he has this great rapport with these uh leaders the pakistanis in particular like they cut a big crypto deal with the world liberty financial so that's why he likes them but like you do five seconds of research into the great and respected field marshal and [42:54] authorities have charged him with torture and crimes against humanity. That's a guy who's like name checking. But regardless, of course, I don't think they're any closer to a deal. I don't know. I assume we're in the same place. Iran thinks they have a lot of leverage because they can close straight or moves. They know Trump is weakened politically. They know that he wants out of this. He doesn't want to go back to war. And so they're going to wait for the United States to walk back some of the more maximalist positions or just get sick of the shit and move on.

[43:24] kind of going down the stairs into the bunker where the recuperating Ayatollah is pointing at the Siena numbers and saying, look, look, we got them. We got them right where we want us. We got Nate Cohn. Yeah. And, you know, there's all these leaks still. Like, Iran reportedly has up to 75% of its missile stockpile. All of its, basically, almost all of its infrastructure along the Strait of Hormuz is operational for them to shut it down. So they could always make things worse. Strait of Hormuz also now has its own Twitter account. Does it? Yeah. [43:54] all the fog in San Francisco? They're calling it something more official, but it's like the Iranian government. Oh, it's the Iranian government doing it? Yeah. Are we doing it in Lego? They just made an official Twitter account so we can get updates from the straight. Just personifying the straight, I guess? Yeah. That's kind of cool. Like sort of red, green, yellow? [44:13] A lot of red. Like sort of when you get the SIG alerts in California traffic, it's like, oh my god, the straighter moves is red today. Fuck. I'm going to be late. Honey, I'm going to be late. [44:24] Cofters over and reporting on the nines and fives. NBC reported last week that the administration is considering changing the name of the war from Operation Epic Fury to Operation Sledgehammer. We have to get a little more phallic again. Or something else entirely in order to, quote, effectively restart the clock with Congress. Is that how it works? New operation name. Now they can't get you? No. Now you can do whatever wars you want?

[44:54] to tweak and get around it. I mean, it's just crazy. It's obviously the same conflict, like changing the name doesn't matter. [44:59] Every president since Nixon has claimed the War Powers Act is unconstitutional. They all hate it, but it was enacted over Nixon's veto in 1973. And so Congress has leverage here if they want to use it. Republicans refuse to use it. Maybe they'll... [45:13] man up now, but we'll see. Trump also wants us to know that he's not just focused on wars far away from home. He's focused on wars right in our own backyard. There have been a bunch of rumblings about the long rumored regime change move in Cuba. Sources told the AP last week that the administration is looking to indict former Cuban President Raul Castro, brother of Fidel, even though he's no longer in power. Then over the weekend, Mark Caputo reported that according to classified U.S. Intel, Cuba has over 300 drones and has recently considered [45:43] even Key West, Florida, which could serve as a handy pretext for an invasion. Cuba's current president, Miguel Diaz-Canel, responded on social media on Monday, writing the quote, Cuba poses no threat, nor does it have aggressive plans or intentions against any country, including the U.S., and that a U.S. attack would, quote, trigger a bloodbath. What'd you make of the Cuba stuff? Seems like he's seems like he's gearing up. [46:05] You want to kick us off on Cuba? I don't think we should go to war with Cuba right now. In the Times poll, there was a question that was something like, when do you believe the U.S. should launch a war against countries that have not attacked us? And it was like 70% are like, don't do that. Never. Don't do that. Unless someone has attacked us, we shouldn't go to war. I don't think it's a good idea. Whatever Trump had come to believe about,

[46:26] killing Soleimani, getting Maduro out of Venezuela, and how fun that was. He sees the polls showing how unpopular the war in Iran is. I hope that that has at the very least chastened them from their idea that they can be regime topplers without it consuming their politics. But it's terrifying. It's terrifying to imagine that they're going to see what they're doing in the Middle East and decide that it needs to be brought closer to them. Yeah, I mean, look, I'd read the story. It was such an obvious pretext to me. But I mean, look, I don't doubt the intel. [46:56] Like, is Cuba acquiring drones? Well, it's 2026, and every military has or is acquiring drones. That would be like not getting rifles or machine guns in World War I. So it also says, like, the intelligence suggests the Cubans would respond to a U.S. attack with drones. Yeah, I was going to say, this Axios story, you have to get way down to reality check, which is three paragraphs, four paragraphs from the bottom, until you find out that, oh, by the way, the intel is that it's retaliatory. This is not a preemptive strike on Miami. [47:26] is what they would do if we attacked them. Because we all know if they did a preemptive strike on Miami, that would be suicidal because it would fucking flatten the country. So I also just would like to think that if we are on the verge of going to war with another country, that the evidence would not be laundered through anonymous sources into a daily tip sheet that perhaps there'd be more information. Well, I have bad news for you. Judy Miller would like a word with you, pal. But that was the New York Times. Sorry, you're right, you're right. I do think, though, every indicator light is flashing when it comes to possible regime change operations because there's this leak, which creates the pretext of this being an imminent threat.

[47:56] John Ratcliffe just went to Cuba and had this message from Trump. There is the indictment, the rumored indictment of Raul Castro, which was a very important part of the case for why they had to do what they did against Maduro, which was extract him from Venezuela and bring him to New York for prosecution. There's been all these reports of a huge increase of intelligence over flights by the US. So I would be very worried if I were a Cuban official. And meanwhile, if you're a [48:23] The United States has a blockade on that's allowed no oil and gas into your country, and people are starving to death. They have one to two hours of electricity a day. Hospitals can't operate. What we are doing is criminal. It is [48:36] absolutely evil. You're starving a population of people to death. And the most likely outcome is that the government collapses and there is a mass exodus and migration crisis to the United States, which MAGA has told us they do not want to happen. I don't understand what these lunatics are fucking doing here, but it is utterly immoral, just a horrific, horrific policy right now. I think that the insane thought running through Donald Trump's head is his response to launching [49:06] disastrous war in Iran that is unpopular, that has cost us billions of dollars, that has spiked gas prices everywhere, is I got to launch a war that's more popular and easy. I got to go back to the Venezuela model because they all think that Venezuela was some big fucking success, right? And so it's like, that was an easy one. So I got to get my mojo back by going to invade Cuba now that Iran's a big fucking mess, which is insane. Did you see a...

[49:27] Rubio in his... [49:29] Maduro tracks. Yes. Like it's all just a game. [49:32] It's all just trolling. It's all content. I don't think it was that flattering. No, I think it was... I talked about this and I'll ever leave it, but I do think... [49:39] Maduro wore it better. I'm not even joking. He just looked more comfortable. Rubio looked like [49:44] the suit was wearing him. But I was looking at that. I was like, why are you doing this? He was a little posed, too. It was a long pose. But I was looking at it. I was like, what are we supposed to [49:56] Okay, what is this meant to put? Boy, you're tough. You're wearing the same clothes. What was the message? And now I'm like, oh, was this about how we'll do this again? We're going to do this? Is it a Cuba thing? What the fuck was the outfit? What am I meant to take from this photo, Stephen Chung? Yeah, that's a good question. I agree with you. I do think Trump wants to change the channel and kind of get us onto a new topic that isn't Iran that makes him sound tough again. I do think, though, that Cuba falls in the Venezuela-Iran situation. [50:25] Cuba, axis of evil bucket of like neocons telling him, sir, you'll be a historic figure, sir, if you make big changes here. And he's down and it will gargle your balls. Well, I mean, you don't need to do something else to get that. That's already happening. That's priced in. But, you know, he's also in Florida surrounded by a bunch of very like rich, hard line, you know, Miami Cubans who, you know, have been waiting for this for a long time and, you know, want their real estate assets back on the island. So I don't I hope I'm wrong. [50:55] Cubano or whatever Wall Street will make up a new term for it. It's not going to be stupid, but it does seem like it's nerve-wracking. Well, if he doesn't do Cuba, then there's always Greenland. Remember the critical national security issue of Greenland? A quick refresher of the back in January after threatening to invade, Trump did a taco. It announced the, quote, framework of a future deal with respect to Greenland and, in fact, the entire Arctic region.

[51:25] Yeah, I bet. Greenland's specifically concerned about Trump's June 14th birthday and July 4th is upcoming dates where Trump's attention could swing back around to them as he starts thinking about his legacy. Un-fucking-real. [51:44] What do you think? Are those concerns well-founded? What do you think about the Greenlandic concerns expressed in the New York Times piece? Let's just pause and sit in the idea that the Danes are concerned that Trump will get more bellicose around his birthday. That's where we're at. That's what we do. He's turning 80. You never know. America's turning 250. [52:07] They're not going to be content with just the fireworks. No, no. You're going to want to get some. No, they want Greenland. Somebody's got to give him a little. He wants it. Look, he wants the great at the end of his name. He knows that when the Russians got more territory, they got to be the great. So we just got to find some fucking chunk of land somewhere. Get me Cuba. Get me Greenland. Just somewhere. Make Venezuela the 51st state. Something. We got to expand the map. [52:31] I can't believe we're talking about this again. This sucks. It's so crazy. It's like, do you guys see the Tim Dillon bit? We said, we're not the high school bully anymore. We're the weird kid who may or may not have a gun. We're not the quarterback. We're not the jock. We're the college kid who keeps going to high school parties, might be a pedophile, and has a gun. That is us as a country. [52:52] Good work, everybody. That is it. That is it. I think we made a mistake electing this guy. Yeah. Yeah, well.

[53:04] This podcast is sponsored by Squarespace. Squarespace is the all-in-one website platform designed to elevate your online presence and drive your success. Squarespace provides all the tools you need to promote and get paid for your services in one platform. Whether you offer consultations, events, or other experiences, Squarespace can help you grow your business. Squarespace offers a complete library of professionally designed and award-winning website templates with options for every use and category. No matter where you start, your website is flexible. [53:28] With intuitive drag and drop editing, beautiful styling options, unrivaled visual design effects, and more ways to list what you offer, no experience required, every dream needs a domain. Squarespace Domains makes it easy to find the best name for your business at one fair, all inclusive price, no hidden fees or add-ons required. Every Squarespace domain comes with advanced privacy and security tools included to ensure your domain remains online and protected. Make smarter business decisions with Squarespace's intuitive built-in analytics tools. Review your website traffic, learn where to focus engagement, track revenue from bookings, [53:58] from one place. Head to squarespace.com for a free trial. When you're ready to launch, go to squarespace.com slash crooked to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain. That's squarespace.com slash crooked. [54:11] Now that we just talked about Trump potentially trying to conquer several additional nations, possibly because it would look cool on a map, it's probably a good time to mention that there's been a revival of the debate about Trump's age and fitness for the job and whether Democrats should be making a bigger deal about it. Lauren Egan at The Bulwark and Jonathan LeMire at The Atlantic are both out with big pieces, arguing that it's time for Democrats to make it a bigger issue. We get subscriber questions about this a lot.

[54:41] big of a deal about Trump's age as you were about Biden's. You're being hypocritical. So in the spirit of open dialogue, I guess we're going to debate it. Let's debate it. Let's debate it. [54:51] Austin. Austin's bringing out a Vote Save America mug with three positions in it. I'm not going to look till we all. Let's all open at the same time. [54:59] Pro, meaning it's something we should talk about more. Anti. [55:03] You can guess what that means. And moderator. Okay, great. Ugh. [55:07] I am the moderator. I am anti. Wow. I'm pro. Let's go, bitch. Shit. It's fucking owned. Can I get a little... Amen. Like NBC music? Tonight. [55:21] All right. I'll be moderating this debate. John, you will be arguing that Democrats must make a greater issue out of Donald Trump's age. Tommy will take the con. You have the opening statement of 30 seconds. [55:35] uh... [55:36] Did Joe Biden lose the last election or have to drop out of the last election because he was too old? Yes. Was it the biggest concern of every voter everywhere because everyone made a big issue and Republicans made a big issue of his age? Yes. Yep. So Donald Trump's hands are falling off right now. He looks like he looks like it was like a fucking bad morgue job on his hands before he got in the casket. Sure. He's basically melting before our eyes. He's got all kinds of bruises all over the place. [56:06] full of it. It's just purple. [56:10] And yet Democrats are out there just talking about affordability and not talking about the fact that the President of the United States is decomposing before our eyes and Democrats won't talk about it, even though these were the same Democrats that tried to push Joe Biden out of the race. Wow, a powerful argument. Tommy, your counter. John, you ignorant slut. I don't want to get in between you and Aaron Rupar's feed and your little handjob issue there with the Trump. But Trump

[56:36] Trump is not running again. So none of this matters. Democrats have zero credibility on this issue. After spending years pretending they couldn't see Joe Biden's physical decline as he was shuffling around in sneakers and falling over sandbags. [57:06] The napping is weird. [57:08] admittedly it's also very funny when the white house uh says that he blinked for 10 seconds long blanks these are long blanks admittedly that's weird but he still does a lot of events he's out there all the time he's in rallies he looks vibrant and [57:22] He's a big, looks vibrant. What are you talking about? You can't even stand up. You can't make him a martyr. All right. So let me, let me just throw some questions that I, in each of your directions, I'll start, I'll start with you, Tommy. Uh, [57:34] You do notice that there's a significant decline in how he communicates from today to how he communicated even four or eight years ago, that his cadence has changed, that he's not as clear. He is more meandering. He's posting all hours of the night. Like these are things that are should be a liability. I think he's always done these things. I think he's always been kind of incoherent. [57:53] I think he's always posted. He's never slept. But I'm curious how you would explain the difference, right? Like he is. Yes, you're right. He has always been this way. But I think it's indisputable that it is all worse. Like he is rambling more. He is. The weave. It's the weave. But the weave is getting worse. Do you think it's getting like he is changing? Depending on your perspective. I think like jokes aside, I think I don't know that I notice him that much more rambly than he used to be. Because I think he's always been rambly. Like he does look tired.

[58:23] legitimately falling asleep in events. It's noticeable. The hand stuff is weird. And by the way, they're clearly lying about the hand stuff because they initially said it was his handshaking hand. And then the other hand had the bruising too. So he also, he also keeps going to the dentist and no one. Dude, how many annual dentist trips? He's doing a lot of dentist trips. He's doing a lot of physicals and things that no one's telling, no one's telling us why his health is the way it is. And there's no one's asking questions. And there's a doctor's office in the West Wing. So you would only go to Walter Reed or Bethesda or wherever he's going now to get like [58:53] There's also dental. There's also the dentist office in the White House. He's got to go to a special dentist. So, John, question to you. How would a Democrat who was somebody who defended Joe Biden's ability to run again make this argument without seeming? [59:07] Like they're full of shit. I was wrong about Joe Biden. And I should have said something earlier. And that's what I'm doing this time around, because Donald Trump is in bad shape and he should not be leading the country. And any Republican that still supports him and that doesn't want to, you know, pressure the cabinet to invoke the 25th Amendment, then they are just feeding into this cover up for Donald Trump's age and his dementia. And he is just putting us all at risk and Republicans won't do anything about it.

[59:37] approval rating is highly correlated with how Republicans are going to do in the midterms. And by talking more about how he has dementia and he is losing his marbles, then we should we could get his approval even lower and that Democrats can then do better in the midterms. Last question for you, Tommy. Joe Biden's age and Joe Biden's disapproval on the economy became linked. The fact that the economy was bad was a sign he wasn't up for the job. The fact that he was up for the job made people doubt that he could fix the economy. Uh. [1:00:02] We are trying to make an argument that Republicans, we have to win the House and the Senate and that Republicans refuse to tell the truth about Donald Trump. Shouldn't the fact that Donald Trump is decomposing for our eyes, rambling at all hours, falling asleep in meetings. Shouldn't we be saying these Republicans won't be honest about that? That who why are they not telling the truth about this? What are we not knowing about this? Shouldn't we be making this one of the lines of argument that we use when we try to accuse Republicans of not holding Trump accountable? [1:00:32] leading question. Clearly, they're covering up something. The guys, the multiple annual doctor visits, this is crazy. It's all pretext. We should push for more information. There is muscle memory here. I think if we get people to a critical mass of concern about this, they will care. Also, I think Trump will hate it. If we call him a sad, sick old man, [1:00:52] He would hate that. [1:00:53] So just working that in there could be fun. Now you argue the other side. Yeah, no, I'll argue the other side. Because I think Tommy's best point was he's not running again. And so what difference, as Hillary Clinton once said, what difference does it make if he is decrepit, if they are covering something up? The reason this was a potent argument against Joe Biden is because Joe Biden was asking voters for four more years in office. Donald Trump will never ask voters for four more years in office. He might try to stay. No, he won't.

[1:01:24] But he's not going to ask voters for four more years. I mean, he might run for a third term. That's not going to happen. He's going to try to just sit there and be like, I got the military. Just park? Yeah, no one's going to let him run. But so he's not going to ask for you. So what is the purpose of Trump? What is the, if we're trying to win a midterm, what is the story we're trying to tell about Donald Trump that is most true? And the story that is most true is what you said at the beginning of this episode, which is this whole term is a smash and grab. He wants to make as much money as he can. [1:01:53] this legacy in history where he conquers half the globe, and he doesn't give a shit about people. He doesn't give a shit about people, and he's never given a shit about people, and that's a consistent story through time, and whether he has dementia now or he's losing his marbles or not, it doesn't really matter. So I think the way that I would square this is... [1:02:10] I think that's right. Democrats are more passionate about the Democrats paid a political price. [1:02:15] for defending Joe Biden [1:02:17] And when people had concerns about his age, even after he dropped out, because it came to be evidence that Democrats couldn't be trusted. [1:02:23] more broadly. And my argument would only be no, age should not be the central argument we make against Donald Trump. But if we can make the fact that Republicans refuse to be honest about not just Trump's corruption and unaccountability and brazen theft, but also just his rambling and crazy nonsense. And you make every time he does that part of a story about how he's unfit, including because he's getting old, then that's part of why these Republicans can't be trusted. That's the [1:02:53] do for it even that as you say that like you you kind of just like threw in corruption there but it's like so he's he doesn't know what he's doing he's crazy but he's also smart enough to be out there stealing all the money i just think like the incoherence is priced in like the the weave is a thing that's like a joke but it's also not a joke you know what i mean like people know he's a goof ball he's all over the place he says weird shit but also like he's funny he's big and imposing he seems sharp at events a lot of times and like the hand shit is very odd but like it's also weird

[1:03:23] sharp when we were all saying he's been fucking crazy since he came on the scene in 2016 yeah it's weird it's weird for democrats to be in the position be like you know what he's just not up for the job he used to be but now he's not up for the job i i think look i think i don't think anyone should make that that argument i think if you go back and look at about like the debates with jeb bush first the debate with kamala harris like there's been a crazy decline but even putting that aside here's the thing that i find very annoying about all this this it's the same kind [1:03:53] say this, if you won't say the same exact thing about Trump that you said about Joe Biden, then you're being a hypocrite. As if we can't see the difference between the way Joe Biden looked and the way Donald Trump looked. The fact that Joe Biden was disappearing from the public. Look, if you think Donald Trump is too old for the job, I'm sure. I totally agree. He's too old. He's too selfish. He's too much of a fucking dictator for the job. He's also the most accessible president we have ever had. He is on camera every fucking day. He's answering questions every day. And like [1:04:23] seems vital. Yeah, nuts, loses the thread, all the ways in which he's terrible and shouldn't be in office. He should be impeached and removed immediately. I'm not in charge of this. But like to act as if there isn't a big difference between the way Donald Trump is aging and the way Joe Biden is aging is to once again deny what we can see with our own fucking eyes. Yeah, but yeah, but to me, that is like all beside the point. Even if you can argue that back and forth, whoever thinks Joe Biden was worse or Trump was worse, whatever. But it's again, the question is, [1:04:50] To what end? He is a second term president. If Donald Trump was sitting here saying, I'm going for more years and we're trying to figure out how to defeat Donald Trump. The to one end answer is you try to drive down his negatism or you make it an issue that other Republicans need to speak to. And like suddenly they're vouching for him not being senile or old or whatever. I think we're a long way from here to there.

[1:05:20] nothing about the fact that he's literally stealing from taxpayers out of their pocket and launched a war that's shot up gas prices. Hand to make up or theft. I think you'd rather do that one. And if he really did. Why not both? Okay, well, you only have so many things that you can say out of your mouth. And if it was so clear, right? Like, if he was real, like, look, I agree he's in decline. [1:05:38] So there's not some magic words that Democrats can use to make something more. They can make it more of an issue, but they can't make it the issue. If Donald Trump was as having the kind of muttering debate that Joe Biden had, I guarantee you would be a big political issue. And it wouldn't be because Chuck Schumer decided it was on some given day. That's a calm, sad, sick old man. Let's go to town. Let's go to town. Get him in. Figure out if you got the right words. I won. OK. Congrats. Good for you. Congrats to our winner, John Lovett. That's our show for today. [1:06:08] the new show on Friday. [1:06:37] . [1:06:41] Thank you.